FAQ

Register       Login

ATTENTION:
This site has been recently moved. 
If you had an account on our old forum site, you will have to register a new account here in order to be able to post replies.
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 11 Mar 2024 07:04 PM by Craig Podgurski
ACJA 7-204: Private Process Server
�6 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Page 2 of 2 << < 12
Author Messages
New Member
Posts: New Member

--
11 Mar 2024 01:26 PM
The latest proposed changes appear to turn Administrative Order (A.O.) No. 2023-227 and ACJA §7-204 on its head and are concerning to APSA. We see in the latest proposal a series of changes where in many instances there is no need for change. In some instances, proposed changes appear to diminish the value and due process rights of process servers in the state.

There is only one proposed change [ACJA §7-204(L)(4)(n)] to which APSA approves without objection.

APSA and the state’s process servers have already seen a reduction in other process server course offerings available. APSA believes if the proposed changes are enacted, no positive results will come from reducing the minimum mandated continuing education hours or other related educational changes. Some providers may exit the market, completely.

A ripple effect of harm to not only the desired professionalism of the process server, but to the knowledge base by which process servers operate and the public depends is projected. The courts and public will feel the adverse effects of having less educated process servers.
Some of the proposed changes appear to affect the process server's due process rights. In disciplinary matters, process servers are already at a disadvantage. The process server faces an uphill battle in these administrative hearings which start with a presumption of guilt, rather than innocence. These proposed changes do not make that a better situation.

APSA examined the approved list of process server education to determine the degree of accuracy and viability of pre-approved continuing education providers and classes. He results were disappointing. They are captioned in our comment letter.

Excepting the changes proposed in ACJA §7-204(L)(4)(n), the Arizona Process Servers Association, as a continuing education provider and association representing many of Arizona’s process servers, objects or remains concerned as to several of the changes proposed, and urges the AJC to not approve the CLD’s requested changes at this time.

Respectfully submitted,
Arizona Process Servers Association
/S/
Barry R. Goldman
Administrator, Secretary/Treasurer

Larry J. Ratcliff, President
John Osborn, Vice President
Barry R. Goldman, Administrator, Secretary/Treasurer
Ronald R. Ezell, Immed. Past Pres.
Susie Baldwin (Director #1)
Kay Dean (Director #2)
Gregory Scott Hardy (Director #3)
Nathan Botsch (Director #4)
Matthew Uthe (Director #5)
Tracy Arnold (Director #6)
Attachments
New Member
Posts: New Member

--
11 Mar 2024 07:04 PM
I've been working in the process serving industry for 13 years and our industry is plagued with incompetence and disregard for nature of our work from outside and within. Reducing continuing education to 3 hours per year serves to further intensify these issues. I am opposed to this rule change
Craig Podgurski
Arizona Quick Serve
9393 N 90th St #121
Scottsdale AZ 85258
480-314-5050
Topic is locked
Page 2 of 2 << < 12